
How people understand the world and form their values and character, and how much of this is owed to language, to thought, to the brain and to circumstance; and, as technology keeps accumulating and AI arrives, so that work no longer needs most people, whether the old theories can still say how people should live, be educated and be organized. Measuring from texts arranged by date how people in the past expressed concepts and what they believed is one of my ways of answering these questions.
The Chinese case of the word-vector research: when, in the traditional Chinese political vocabulary, people joining together was called public deliberation, and when it was condemned as faction.
Vox · PaperThe Arabic-Islamic case of the word-vector research: the boundaries of horizontal solidarity drawn by ʿaṣabiyya and seven other words in Arabic-Islamic political thought.
Vox, Leimma · PaperOf the more than 182,000 Latin inscriptions that can be searched by computer, 984 contain collegium (association) and only one contains coniuratio (conspiracy), and that one is a colonial law forbidding such gatherings. Judging sentence by sentence whether a dozen words for joining together are praised or condemned in Cicero, Livy and other authors, and comparing decrees of the Senate and Roman law, the paper shows that the Romans had no legitimate name for a horizontal political association.
Vox · PaperWeber held that groups in Chinese cities could not make contracts or go to law in their own name, while villages could, through the village temple. Yamen documents from Qing Hsinchu show that the headmen of the city gates and of the villages obtained office by exactly the same procedure: joint nomination, official verification, and the issue of a seal. Whether a group could act in its own name depended on whether the government appointed it or accepted its petitions, not on whether it stood in a city or a village.
Vox · PaperOne view holds that after industrialization, technology and the business cycle came to matter more and more to how a person fared, the causal link between effort and reward weakened, and people in turn stopped believing that effort is rewarded. This project counts, in long runs of texts arranged year by year, how often words for effort and diligence appear together with words for reward, success and getting rich, and in what tone, to see in which year this belief began to weaken and how fast, and sets the result against the dates of industrialization, economic crises and automation.
Wang Yangming formed his way of understanding the world by reading the classics; he also handled a great deal of practical business while campaigning in southern Jiangxi and suppressing the rebellion of the Prince of Ning. This project divides his writings into three kinds, teaching, official documents and letters, measures how far the vocabulary of each lies from the Four Books and Five Classics, and asks whether the vocabulary of his official documents moved towards that of his teaching after the campaigns. It asks only what the material can show, and does not speculate about what he would have been had he not read the classics.